By Nancy A. Youssef and Jonathan S. Landay
McClatchy Newspapers
WASHINGTON - Amid a rising war of words between the United States and Iran over the Strait of Hormuz, U.S. and European officials saw no imminent threat Wednesday to the passageway through which some 40 percent of the world's seaborne oil travels daily.
Instead, they said, the latest Iranian threat to close the route reflected Tehran's anger at the U.S. pledge to impose sanctions on its nuclear program that for the first time directly target Iran's oil exports, the source of some 80 percent of its government revenue.
A European Union diplomat said that despite "a history of violating almost any international agreement," expectations were low that Iran would blockade the waterway at the mouth of the Persian Gulf.
And while such a blockade could lead to a confrontation with U.S. forces and disrupt the global economy, analysts expressed skepticism that Iran's navy had the capacity to shut down the strait for an extended period.
Amid the tensions, the diplomat said there was nevertheless a "pretty good prospect" that the 27-member EU, which imports some 25 percent of its petroleum supplies from Iran, will adopt an embargo on Iranian oil purchases next month.
The apparent trigger for the flare-up is defense funding legislation that President Barack Obama is preparing to sign.
It contains a provision that would allow the U.S. for the first time to penalize foreign banks that do business with Iran's Central Bank, the main conduit for payments for Iranian
oil.The provision would substantially expand existing U.S. sanctions against Tehran. It is aimed at restricting funds for Iran's nuclear program, which the U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency last month reported may be secretly developing a nuclear warhead for a ballistic missile. Iran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.
The tensions began Tuesday when Iran's vice president, Mohammad Reza-Rahimi, said that if the West imposed sanctions on Iran's oil exports, "then even one drop of oil cannot flow from the Strait of Hormuz."
Then, on Wednesday, Iran's navy chief, Rear Adm. Habibollah Sayyari, said closing the strait "is very easy for Iranian naval forces. Iran has comprehensive control over the strategic waterway."
That prompted a response from the U.S. 5th Fleet, based in the Persian Gulf nation of Bahrain. The Navy said it was prepared to defend the key passageway, through which about 15 million barrels of oil pass daily.
"The free flow of goods and services through the Strait of Hormuz is vital to regional and global prosperity," Navy Lt. Rebecca Rebarich said. "Anyone who threatens to disrupt freedom of navigation in an international strait is clearly outside the community of nations; any disruption will not be tolerated."
At the Pentagon, officials said they were confident the Navy had adequate resources in the region to defend against any potential Iranian threat.
The USS John C. Stennis, a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier that leads a naval strike force, is operating in the northern Arabian Sea, having just completed providing air operations in Iraq.
A naval blockade is unlikely, as it would be considered an act of war by Iran against a far better U.S. naval fleet. Iran spends roughly $8 billion on its military compared with nearly $700 billion slated for next year's U.S. defense budget.
But Iran could employ less direct tactics such as placing mines in the strait, which the U.S. would have to find and disarm, a laborious process that could expose American ships to Iranian attack.
Iran also could use surface craft to harass oil tankers.
Moreover, Iran could respond to any confrontation with the United States through terrorist attacks on U.S. and other targets through its proxies, including Hezbollah, the militant Shiite Muslim movement that controls Lebanon's government.
Micah Zenko, an expert with the Council on Foreign Relations, said there is no scenario for which the U.S. has done more contingency planning than clearing an Iranian blockade of the strait because of its importance to global commerce.
"Iran simply could not close the Strait of Hormuz for any length of time," Zenko said.
Zenko noted that Iran has threatened for different reasons to blockade the Strait of Hormuz every year since 1980 but has never actually done so. However, it did attack shipping in the western Persian Gulf during the 1980-88 war with Iraq.
Source: http://www.twincities.com/national/ci_19635812?source=rss
land of the lost cleveland cavaliers cleveland cavaliers war horse k cups best buy we bought a zoo
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.